Compare
Reliability: 6 options
6 options compared · 4 tutorial, 1 skill, 1 agent
Comparing 6 options
Reliability — SLOs, error budgets, retries vs idempotency, graceful degradation and incident review. The registry currently holds 6 resources: 4 tutorials, 1 skill, 1 agent.
Side by side
Every field below comes from the curated record — nothing is sponsored or ranked by payment:
| Resource | Type | Difficulty | Verification | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incident Postmortem Writer | Skill | beginner | community | 38.9 |
| The data reliability mental model — freshness, completeness, correctness | Tutorial | beginner | community | 34.15 |
| Capstone — the reliability checklist for a pipeline you can page on | Tutorial | intermediate | community | 34.15 |
| DR and replication — design the recovery path before you need it | Tutorial | intermediate | community | 34.15 |
| Idempotency and reruns — make every task safe to run twice | Tutorial | intermediate | community | 34.15 |
| Incident Assistant | Agent | intermediate | community | 30 |
Trust breakdown
Verification mix: 6 community. No evidence gaps: every claim on file matches the record. Read how verification works — nothing here is independently audited yet, and the site says so everywhere it matters.
Security posture
Flagged entries: Incident Postmortem Writer (1), Incident Assistant (3). Flags record declared capabilities (credentials, write access, network calls) — they are facts to review, not verdicts. Every entry also passes the 30-rule static trust scan; findings print on each detail page.
How to choose
How to choose: start with Incident Postmortem Writer, The data reliability mental model — freshness, completeness, correctness for the gentlest on-ramp; Weight verification and evidence over score when two entries are close, and check the last-verified date on each page — the registry re-checks every 180 days.