Compare
CDC: 6 options
6 options compared · 1 tutorial, 1 skill, 1 project, 1 runbook, 1 pattern, 1 reference
Comparing 6 options
CDC — Change data capture: log-based vs query-based, ordering, deletes and merge strategies. The registry currently holds 6 resources: 1 tutorial, 1 skill, 1 project, 1 runbook, 1 pattern, 1 reference.
Side by side
Every field below comes from the curated record — nothing is sponsored or ranked by payment:
| Resource | Type | Difficulty | Verification | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDC Merge Designer | Skill | advanced | community | 39.5 |
| Postgres CDC to Lakehouse | Pattern | advanced | community | 34.25 |
| Stream changes, not tables — CDC from Postgres into the lakehouse | Tutorial | intermediate | community | 34.15 |
| Postgres → CDC → Kafka → Lakehouse | Project | advanced | community | 33.65 |
| CDC stopped | Runbook | advanced | community | 29.25 |
| Debezium Documentation | Reference | — | community | 26.7 |
Trust breakdown
Verification mix: 6 community. No evidence gaps: every claim on file matches the record. Read how verification works — nothing here is independently audited yet, and the site says so everywhere it matters.
Security posture
Flagged entries: CDC Merge Designer (1), Postgres CDC to Lakehouse (2), Postgres → CDC → Kafka → Lakehouse (4), CDC stopped (3). Flags record declared capabilities (credentials, write access, network calls) — they are facts to review, not verdicts. Every entry also passes the 30-rule static trust scan; findings print on each detail page.
How to choose
How to choose: defer CDC Merge Designer, Postgres CDC to Lakehouse until you have production context. Weight verification and evidence over score when two entries are close, and check the last-verified date on each page — the registry re-checks every 180 days.